Melbourne Trams vs National Geographic Traveller

Melbourne Trams

JOhn Lyons
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
VS

National Geographic Traveller

APL Media Limited
App Store
$128/mo
~$1.5K/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner National Geographic Traveller wins +1064% vs other
Installs winner National Geographic Traveller wins +288% vs other
MAU winner National Geographic Traveller wins +715% vs other
Rating winner National Geographic Traveller wins +377% vs other

Why National Geographic Traveller is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. National Geographic Traveller earns roughly 12× more per month than Melbourne Trams - $128 vs $11.
  2. Subscription model. National Geographic Traveller runs a $13.99/mo subscription that compounds; Melbourne Trams relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. National Geographic Traveller has ~2K lifetime installs vs Melbourne Trams's ~400 - 3.9× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. National Geographic Traveller runs 9 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full National Geographic Traveller report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Melbourne Trams
vs
National Geographic Traveller
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$11
▶
$128
Annual revenue (est.)
$127
▶
$1.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
34.8
▶
283.65
App Store rating
1.00★
▶
4.77★
Total ratings
1
▶
31
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$13.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
9 tiers

Melbourne Trams

JOhn Lyons
App Store
Category
Travel
Price
USD0.99
Released
Oct 25, 2013
Last updated
Nov 21, 2022
File size
8.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
6
Languages
English
View full Melbourne Trams report →

National Geographic Traveller

APL Media Limited
App Store
Category
Travel
Price
Free
Released
May 8, 2012
Last updated
Aug 20, 2025
File size
17.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.4.7
Languages
English
View full National Geographic Traveller report →

Melbourne Trams trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

National Geographic Traveller trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Melbourne Trams App Store page →National Geographic Traveller App Store page →

Related comparisons

Melbourne Trams iOS vs Uber Request a Ride iOSHappycow Vegan Food Near You iOS vs Melbourne Trams iOSMelbourne Trams iOS vs Peakfinder iOSMelbourne Trams iOS vs Yorkshire Three Peaks iOSMelbourne Trams iOS vs Ryanair iOSArriva Bus App iOS vs Melbourne Trams iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Melbourne Trams or National Geographic Traveller? v
National Geographic Traveller earns about $128 per month, while Melbourne Trams earns about $11. That is a 11.6× revenue gap (~$117 more per month for National Geographic Traveller). Annual revenue: Melbourne Trams ≈ $127/year, National Geographic Traveller ≈ $1.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Melbourne Trams or National Geographic Traveller? v
National Geographic Traveller leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 400 for Melbourne Trams - a 3.9× gap. Melbourne Trams's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. National Geographic Traveller's App Store downloads are estimated from 31 ratings.
Are Melbourne Trams and National Geographic Traveller in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Melbourne Trams and National Geographic Traveller offer? v
Melbourne Trams: no IAP detected on the public listing. National Geographic Traveller: IAP range 9 tiers detected. Melbourne Trams runs a "Paid app ($0.99)" monetization model; National Geographic Traveller runs "Subscription (~$13.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Melbourne Trams or National Geographic Traveller? v
National Geographic Traveller edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 1.0 (gap of 3.8 stars). Rating volume: Melbourne Trams 1 ratings, National Geographic Traveller 31 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Melbourne Trams vs National Geographic Traveller revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $11 for Melbourne Trams and $128 for National Geographic Traveller are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Melbourne Trams or National Geographic Traveller to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.