Melbourne Trams vs PadsPass

Melbourne Trams

JOhn Lyons
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
VS

PadsPass

PadsPass Inc.
App Store
$27/mo
~$319/yr · 550 installs
Revenue winner PadsPass wins +145% vs other
Installs winner PadsPass wins +38% vs other
MAU winner PadsPass wins +184% vs other
Rating winner PadsPass wins +350% vs other

Why PadsPass is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. PadsPass earns roughly 2× more per month than Melbourne Trams - $27 vs $11.
  2. Subscription model. PadsPass runs a $8.33/mo subscription that compounds; Melbourne Trams relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Better app store reviews. PadsPass sits at 4.50★ vs 1.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PadsPass report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Melbourne Trams
vs
PadsPass
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$11
$27
Annual revenue (est.)
$127
$319
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
550
Monthly active users (est.)?
34.8
99
App Store rating
1.00★
4.50★
Total ratings
1
10
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$8.33
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
1 tiers

Melbourne Trams

JOhn Lyons
App Store
Category
Travel
Price
USD0.99
Released
Oct 25, 2013
Last updated
Nov 21, 2022
File size
8.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
6
Languages
English
View full Melbourne Trams report →

PadsPass

PadsPass Inc.
App Store
Category
Travel
Price
Free
Released
Sep 16, 2025
Last updated
May 1, 2026
File size
66.4 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
0.9.13
Languages
English
View full PadsPass report →

Melbourne Trams trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

PadsPass trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Melbourne Trams or PadsPass? v
PadsPass earns about $27 per month, while Melbourne Trams earns about $11. That is a 2.5× revenue gap (~$16 more per month for PadsPass). Annual revenue: Melbourne Trams ≈ $127/year, PadsPass ≈ $319/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Melbourne Trams or PadsPass? v
PadsPass leads with about 550 estimated downloads vs 400 for Melbourne Trams - a 1.4× gap. Melbourne Trams's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PadsPass's App Store downloads are estimated from 10 ratings.
Are Melbourne Trams and PadsPass in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Melbourne Trams and PadsPass offer? v
Melbourne Trams: no IAP detected on the public listing. PadsPass: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Melbourne Trams runs a "Paid app ($0.99)" monetization model; PadsPass runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Melbourne Trams or PadsPass? v
PadsPass edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 1.0 (gap of 3.5 stars). Rating volume: Melbourne Trams 1 ratings, PadsPass 10 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Melbourne Trams vs PadsPass revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $11 for Melbourne Trams and $27 for PadsPass are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Melbourne Trams or PadsPass to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.