Melbourne Trams vs Q-Free Parking Finder
Melbourne Trams
JOhn Lyons
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
VS
Q-Free Parking Finder
Q-Free ASA
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
Revenue winner
Melbourne Trams wins
+1100% vs other
Installs winner
Melbourne Trams wins
+40000% vs other
MAU winner
Melbourne Trams wins
+3480% vs other
Rating winner
Melbourne Trams wins
+100% vs other
Why Melbourne Trams is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Melbourne Trams earns roughly 11× more per month than Q-Free Parking Finder - $11 vs $0.
- Bigger install base. Melbourne Trams has ~400 lifetime installs vs Q-Free Parking Finder's ~0 - 400.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Melbourne Trams sits at 1.00★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Melbourne Trams report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$11
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$127
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
◀
0
Monthly active users (est.)?
34.8
◀
0
App Store rating
1.00★
◀
-
Total ratings
1
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Oct 25, 2013
- Last updated
- Nov 21, 2022
- File size
- 8.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 19, 2014
- Last updated
- Mar 14, 2018
- File size
- 14.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.39
- Languages
- English
Melbourne Trams trajectory
Q-Free Parking Finder trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Melbourne Trams or Q-Free Parking Finder? v
Melbourne Trams earns about $11 per month, while Q-Free Parking Finder earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for Melbourne Trams). Annual revenue: Melbourne Trams ≈ $127/year, Q-Free Parking Finder ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Melbourne Trams or Q-Free Parking Finder? v
Melbourne Trams leads with about 400 estimated downloads vs 0 for Q-Free Parking Finder - a ∞× gap. Melbourne Trams's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Q-Free Parking Finder's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Melbourne Trams and Q-Free Parking Finder in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Melbourne Trams and Q-Free Parking Finder have in-app purchases? v
Melbourne Trams does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Q-Free Parking Finder does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Melbourne Trams runs "Paid app ($0.99)", Q-Free Parking Finder runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Melbourne Trams or Q-Free Parking Finder? v
Melbourne Trams edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Melbourne Trams 1 ratings, Q-Free Parking Finder 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Melbourne Trams vs Q-Free Parking Finder revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $11 for Melbourne Trams and $0 for Q-Free Parking Finder are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Melbourne Trams or Q-Free Parking Finder to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
