Microsoft Launcher vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Microsoft Launcher
Microsoft Corporation
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 68.5M installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$134/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+13400% vs other
Installs winner
Microsoft Launcher wins
+979394% vs other
MAU winner
Microsoft Launcher wins
+342723% vs other
Rating winner
Microsoft Launcher wins
+82% vs other
Why NXV43 Elegant Watch Face is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns roughly 134× more per month than Microsoft Launcher - $134 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Microsoft Launcher
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$134
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
68.5M
◀
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.4M
◀
699.7
App Store rating
4.69★
◀
2.58★
Total ratings
1.7M
◀
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2015
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.260301.0.1177630
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Microsoft Launcher trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Microsoft Launcher or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $134 per month, while Microsoft Launcher earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$134 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: Microsoft Launcher ≈ $0/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Microsoft Launcher or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Microsoft Launcher leads with about 68.5M estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 9794.9× gap. Microsoft Launcher reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Microsoft Launcher and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Microsoft Launcher and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
Microsoft Launcher does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Microsoft Launcher runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)".
Which has better ratings, Microsoft Launcher or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Microsoft Launcher edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 2.1 stars). Rating volume: Microsoft Launcher 66K ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Microsoft Launcher vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Microsoft Launcher and $134 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Microsoft Launcher or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.