Mon E.Leclerc vs That Shopping List
Mon E.Leclerc
E.Leclerc - Infomil
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 17K installs
VS
That Shopping List
Markus Liebschner
App Store
$546/mo
~$6.5K/yr · 9K installs
Revenue winner
That Shopping List wins
+54600% vs other
Installs winner
Mon E.Leclerc wins
+85% vs other
MAU winner
Mon E.Leclerc wins
+83% vs other
Rating winner
That Shopping List wins
+4% vs other
Why That Shopping List is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- That Shopping List earns roughly 546× more per month than Mon E.Leclerc - $546 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full That Shopping List report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$546
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$6.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
17K
◀
9K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.69★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
342
◀
185
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 26, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 30, 2026
- File size
- 234.9 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 10.7.0
- Languages
- English, French, Portuguese, SL, Spanish
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 16, 2016
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 37.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 15.08.05
- Languages
- Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +11 more
Mon E.Leclerc trajectory
That Shopping List trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Mon E.Leclerc or That Shopping List? v
That Shopping List earns about $546 per month, while Mon E.Leclerc earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$546 more per month for That Shopping List). Annual revenue: Mon E.Leclerc ≈ $0/year, That Shopping List ≈ $6.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Mon E.Leclerc or That Shopping List? v
Mon E.Leclerc leads with about 17K estimated downloads vs 9K for That Shopping List - a 1.8× gap. Mon E.Leclerc's App Store downloads are estimated from 342 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. That Shopping List's App Store downloads are estimated from 185 ratings.
Are Mon E.Leclerc and That Shopping List in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Shopping category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Mon E.Leclerc and That Shopping List offer? v
Mon E.Leclerc: no IAP detected on the public listing. That Shopping List: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Mon E.Leclerc runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; That Shopping List runs "Free + one-time IAP (1 tiers)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Mon E.Leclerc or That Shopping List? v
That Shopping List edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Mon E.Leclerc 342 ratings, That Shopping List 185 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Mon E.Leclerc vs That Shopping List revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Mon E.Leclerc and $546 for That Shopping List are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Shopping) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Mon E.Leclerc or That Shopping List to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
