Moonlight Classic Watch Face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Moonlight Classic Watch Face
Time Design LLC
Google Play
$130/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$133/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+2% vs other
Installs winner
Moonlight Classic Watch Face wins
+4% vs other
MAU winner
Moonlight Classic Watch Face wins
+18% vs other
Rating winner
Moonlight Classic Watch Face wins
+57% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Moonlight Classic Watch Face
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$130
▶
$133
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.6K
▶
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
7K
◀
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
824.561
◀
698.4
App Store rating
4.04★
◀
2.58★
Total ratings
174
◀
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Apr 8, 2025
- Last updated
- Dec 3, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Moonlight Classic Watch Face trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Moonlight Classic Watch Face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $133 per month, while Moonlight Classic Watch Face earns about $130. That is a 1.0× revenue gap (~$3 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: Moonlight Classic Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Moonlight Classic Watch Face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Moonlight Classic Watch Face leads with about 7K estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 1.0× gap. Moonlight Classic Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Moonlight Classic Watch Face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Moonlight Classic Watch Face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
Moonlight Classic Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Moonlight Classic Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.49)", NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)".
Which has better ratings, Moonlight Classic Watch Face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Moonlight Classic Watch Face edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 1.5 stars). Rating volume: Moonlight Classic Watch Face 4 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Moonlight Classic Watch Face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $130 for Moonlight Classic Watch Face and $133 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Moonlight Classic Watch Face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.