MWH: Fitness + Wellness vs GI and glycemic load
MWH: Fitness + Wellness
M WOOD INC
App Store
$55.6K/mo
~$666.9K/yr · 440K installs
VS
GI and glycemic load
Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$549/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
MWH: Fitness + Wellness wins
+120715% vs other
Installs winner
MWH: Fitness + Wellness wins
+17095% vs other
MAU winner
MWH: Fitness + Wellness wins
+21559% vs other
Rating winner
MWH: Fitness + Wellness wins
+490% vs other
Why MWH: Fitness + Wellness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MWH: Fitness + Wellness earns roughly 1208× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $55.6K vs $46.
- Subscription model. MWH: Fitness + Wellness runs a $14.95/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. MWH: Fitness + Wellness has ~440K lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 171.9× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. MWH: Fitness + Wellness sits at 4.90★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MWH: Fitness + Wellness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MWH: Fitness + Wellness
vs
GI and glycemic load
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$55.6K
◀
$46
Annual revenue (est.)
$666.9K
◀
$549
Lifetime installs (est.)
440K
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
115K
◀
532.064
App Store rating
4.90★
◀
-
Total ratings
5K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.95
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 3, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 147.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 9.0.19
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Sep 18, 2016
- Last updated
- Sep 30, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.10
- Languages
- -
MWH: Fitness + Wellness trajectory
GI and glycemic load trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MWH: Fitness + Wellness or GI and glycemic load? v
MWH: Fitness + Wellness earns about $55.6K per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 1208.2× revenue gap (~$55.5K more per month for MWH: Fitness + Wellness). Annual revenue: MWH: Fitness + Wellness ≈ $666.9K/year, GI and glycemic load ≈ $549/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MWH: Fitness + Wellness or GI and glycemic load? v
MWH: Fitness + Wellness leads with about 440K estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 171.9× gap. MWH: Fitness + Wellness's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MWH: Fitness + Wellness and GI and glycemic load in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MWH: Fitness + Wellness and GI and glycemic load offer? v
MWH: Fitness + Wellness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. MWH: Fitness + Wellness runs a "Subscription (~$14.95/mo)" monetization model; GI and glycemic load runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MWH: Fitness + Wellness or GI and glycemic load? v
MWH: Fitness + Wellness edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: MWH: Fitness + Wellness 5K ratings, GI and glycemic load 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MWH: Fitness + Wellness vs GI and glycemic load revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $55.6K for MWH: Fitness + Wellness and $46 for GI and glycemic load are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MWH: Fitness + Wellness or GI and glycemic load to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.