ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ vs Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio
ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］
radius co., ltd.
Google Play
$2.2K/mo
~$26.5K/yr · 15K installs
VS
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio
Resonant Cavity Inc.
Google Play
$1.77M/mo
~$21.28M/yr · 49.9M installs
Revenue winner
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio wins
+80090% vs other
Installs winner
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio wins
+324478% vs other
MAU winner
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio wins
+103995% vs other
Rating winner
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio wins
+26% vs other
Why Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio earns roughly 802× more per month than ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ - $1.77M vs $2.2K.
- Subscription model. Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio runs a $8.32/mo subscription that compounds; ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio has ~49.9M lifetime installs vs ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］'s ~15K - 3245.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio sits at 4.62★ vs 3.67★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］
vs
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.2K
▶
$1.77M
Annual revenue (est.)
$26.5K
▶
$21.28M
Lifetime installs (est.)
15K
▶
49.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
6K
▶
6.3M
App Store rating
3.67★
▶
4.62★
Total ratings
641
▶
399K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$8.32
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- USD11.99
- Released
- Jan 4, 2015
- Last updated
- Sep 3, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.1.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 2, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ trajectory
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ or Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio? v
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio earns about $1.77M per month, while ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ earns about $2.2K. That is a 801.9× revenue gap (~$1.77M more per month for Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio). Annual revenue: ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ ≈ $26.5K/year, Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio ≈ $21.28M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ or Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio? v
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio leads with about 49.9M estimated downloads vs 15K for ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ - a 3245.8× gap. ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ and Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music & Audio category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ and Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio offer? v
ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］: no IAP detected on the public listing. Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio: IAP range $0.99 - $69.99 per item. ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ runs a "Paid app ($11.99)" monetization model; Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio runs "Subscription (~$8.32/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ or Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio? v
Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ 13 ratings, Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio 21K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ vs Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.2K for ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ and $1.77M for Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music & Audio) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ハイレゾ再生音楽プレイヤーアプリ［NePLAYER］ or Voloco: Auto Vocal Tune Studio to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.