NXV43 Elegant Watch Face vs Pix Material Expressive Icons

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face

NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$134/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
VS

Pix Material Expressive Icons

PashaPuma Design
Google Play
$562/mo
~$6.7K/yr · 31K installs
Revenue winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +319% vs other
Installs winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +350% vs other
MAU winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +422% vs other
Rating winner Pix Material Expressive Icons wins +73% vs other

Why Pix Material Expressive Icons is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Pix Material Expressive Icons earns roughly 4× more per month than NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - $562 vs $134.
  2. Subscription model. Pix Material Expressive Icons runs a $2.21/mo subscription that compounds; NXV43 Elegant Watch Face relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Pix Material Expressive Icons has ~31K lifetime installs vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face's ~7K - 4.5× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Pix Material Expressive Icons sits at 4.45★ vs 2.58★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pix Material Expressive Icons report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
vs
Pix Material Expressive Icons
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$134
$562
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.6K
$6.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
7K
31K
Monthly active users (est.)?
699.7
4K
App Store rating
2.58★
4.45★
Total ratings
54
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$2.21
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face

NXV Watch Face
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.59
Released
Dec 18, 2021
Last updated
Sep 20, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report →

Pix Material Expressive Icons

PashaPuma Design
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.49
Released
Sep 5, 2021
Last updated
May 8, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
11.7.8.Build
Languages
-
View full Pix Material Expressive Icons report →

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Pix Material Expressive Icons trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons earns about $562 per month, while NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $134. That is a 4.2× revenue gap (~$428 more per month for Pix Material Expressive Icons). Annual revenue: NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year, Pix Material Expressive Icons ≈ $6.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons leads with about 31K estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 4.5× gap. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play. Pix Material Expressive Icons reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are NXV43 Elegant Watch Face and Pix Material Expressive Icons in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do NXV43 Elegant Watch Face and Pix Material Expressive Icons offer? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pix Material Expressive Icons: IAP range $0.49 - $9.99 per item. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs a "Paid app ($1.59)" monetization model; Pix Material Expressive Icons runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 1.9 stars). Rating volume: NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings, Pix Material Expressive Icons 83 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these NXV43 Elegant Watch Face vs Pix Material Expressive Icons revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $134 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face and $562 for Pix Material Expressive Icons are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare NXV43 Elegant Watch Face or Pix Material Expressive Icons to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.