HungryPanda熊猫外卖 vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
HungryPanda熊猫外卖
HUNGRYPANDA LTD
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.3M installs
VS
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
The New York Times Company
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 80.8M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+3381% vs other
MAU winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+1670% vs other
Rating winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+5% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.3M
▶
80.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
274K
▶
4.8M
App Store rating
4.67★
▶
4.91★
Total ratings
21K
▶
539K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 24, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 316.8 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 8.86.0
- Languages
- English, French, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 17, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 108.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.162.0
- Languages
- English
HungryPanda熊猫外卖 trajectory
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, HungryPanda熊猫外卖 or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $0 per month, while HungryPanda熊猫外卖 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: HungryPanda熊猫外卖 ≈ $0/year, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, HungryPanda熊猫外卖 or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.8M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for HungryPanda熊猫外卖 - a 34.8× gap. HungryPanda熊猫外卖's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 539K ratings.
Are HungryPanda熊猫外卖 and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do HungryPanda熊猫外卖 and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals have in-app purchases? v
HungryPanda熊猫外卖 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: HungryPanda熊猫外卖 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, HungryPanda熊猫外卖 or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: HungryPanda熊猫外卖 21K ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 539K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these HungryPanda熊猫外卖 vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for HungryPanda熊猫外卖 and $0 for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare HungryPanda熊猫外卖 or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
