NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
The New York Times Company
App Store
$1.86M/mo
~$22.31M/yr · 80.1M installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+208% vs other
Installs winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+6% vs other
MAU winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+26% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+0% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 3× more per month than NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals - $5.73M vs $1.86M.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's $4.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.86M
▶
$5.73M
Annual revenue (est.)
$22.31M
▶
$68.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
80.1M
◀
75.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.6M
◀
7.6M
App Store rating
4.91★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
534K
◀
502K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 17, 2014
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 209.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.157.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $1.86M. That is a 3.1× revenue gap (~$3.87M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $22.31M/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.1M estimated downloads vs 75.2M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste - a 1.1× gap. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 534K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings.
Are NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 534K ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.86M for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.