OP.TCG vs StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner
OP.TCG
Lops TCG
Google Play
$2.3K/mo
~$27.8K/yr · 86K installs
VS
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner
Next Vision Limited
Google Play
$2.5K/mo
~$30.5K/yr · 90K installs
Revenue winner
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner wins
+10% vs other
Installs winner
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner wins
+5% vs other
MAU winner
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner wins
+6% vs other
Rating winner
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner wins
+4% vs other
Why StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner charges $17.88/mo vs OP.TCG's $17.29/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
OP.TCG
vs
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.3K
▶
$2.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$27.8K
▶
$30.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
86K
▶
90K
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
11K
App Store rating
4.42★
▶
4.59★
Total ratings
1K
▶
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$17.29
▶
$17.88
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.8
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 28, 2026
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.4
- Languages
- -
OP.TCG trajectory
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, OP.TCG or StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner? v
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner earns about $2.5K per month, while OP.TCG earns about $2.3K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$226 more per month for StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner). Annual revenue: OP.TCG ≈ $27.8K/year, StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner ≈ $30.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, OP.TCG or StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner? v
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner leads with about 90K estimated downloads vs 86K for OP.TCG - a 1.0× gap. OP.TCG reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play. StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are OP.TCG and StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do OP.TCG and StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner offer? v
OP.TCG: IAP range $2.99 - $99.99 per item. StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner: IAP range $7.99 - $39.99 per item. OP.TCG runs a "Subscription (~$17.29/mo)" monetization model; StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner runs "Subscription (~$17.88/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, OP.TCG or StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner? v
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: OP.TCG 32 ratings, StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner 825 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these OP.TCG vs StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.3K for OP.TCG and $2.5K for StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare OP.TCG or StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.