Opal: Screen Time Control vs IFTTT - Automate work and home
Opal: Screen Time Control
Opal OS
App Store
$640.4K/mo
~$7.69M/yr · 7.9M installs
VS
IFTTT - Automate work and home
IFTTT, Inc
Google Play
$288.9K/mo
~$3.47M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Opal: Screen Time Control wins
+122% vs other
Installs winner
IFTTT - Automate work and home wins
+29% vs other
MAU winner
Opal: Screen Time Control wins
+191% vs other
Rating winner
Opal: Screen Time Control wins
+48% vs other
Why Opal: Screen Time Control is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Opal: Screen Time Control earns roughly 2× more per month than IFTTT - Automate work and home - $640.4K vs $288.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Opal: Screen Time Control undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $26.04/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- More monetization surfaces. Opal: Screen Time Control runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. Opal: Screen Time Control sits at 4.78★ vs 3.23★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Opal: Screen Time Control report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$640.4K
◀
$288.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$7.69M
◀
$3.47M
Lifetime installs (est.)
7.9M
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.4M
◀
817K
App Store rating
4.78★
◀
3.23★
Total ratings
72K
▶
187K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$26.04
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 15, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- 258.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.158
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese +2 more
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 24, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Opal: Screen Time Control trajectory
IFTTT - Automate work and home trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
Opal: Screen Time Control earns about $640.4K per month, while IFTTT - Automate work and home earns about $288.9K. That is a 2.2× revenue gap (~$351.5K more per month for Opal: Screen Time Control). Annual revenue: Opal: Screen Time Control ≈ $7.69M/year, IFTTT - Automate work and home ≈ $3.47M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
IFTTT - Automate work and home leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 7.9M for Opal: Screen Time Control - a 1.3× gap. Opal: Screen Time Control's App Store downloads are estimated from 72K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. IFTTT - Automate work and home reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Opal: Screen Time Control and IFTTT - Automate work and home in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Opal: Screen Time Control and IFTTT - Automate work and home offer? v
Opal: Screen Time Control: IAP range 5 tiers detected. IFTTT - Automate work and home: IAP range $3.99 - $169.99 per item. Opal: Screen Time Control runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; IFTTT - Automate work and home runs "Subscription (~$26.04/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
Opal: Screen Time Control edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: Opal: Screen Time Control 72K ratings, IFTTT - Automate work and home 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Opal: Screen Time Control vs IFTTT - Automate work and home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $640.4K for Opal: Screen Time Control and $288.9K for IFTTT - Automate work and home are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
