Opal: Screen Time Control vs IFTTT - Automate work and home

Opal: Screen Time Control

Opal OS
App Store
$731.0K/mo
~$8.77M/yr · 9.0M installs
VS

IFTTT - Automate work and home

IFTTT, Inc
Google Play
$289.5K/mo
~$3.47M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner Opal: Screen Time Control wins +153% vs other
Installs winner IFTTT - Automate work and home wins +13% vs other
MAU winner Opal: Screen Time Control wins +231% vs other
Rating winner Opal: Screen Time Control wins +48% vs other

Why Opal: Screen Time Control is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Opal: Screen Time Control earns roughly 3× more per month than IFTTT - Automate work and home - $731.0K vs $289.5K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Opal: Screen Time Control undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $26.04/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. More monetization surfaces. Opal: Screen Time Control runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
  4. Better app store reviews. Opal: Screen Time Control sits at 4.74★ vs 3.21★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Opal: Screen Time Control report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Opal: Screen Time Control
vs
IFTTT - Automate work and home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$731.0K
$289.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$8.77M
$3.47M
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.0M
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.7M
819K
App Store rating
4.74★
3.21★
Total ratings
82K
187K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$26.04
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
0 tiers

Opal: Screen Time Control

Opal OS
App Store
Category
Productivity
Price
Free
Released
Dec 15, 2020
Last updated
Jul 1, 2026
File size
264.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.3
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Polish +4 more
View full Opal: Screen Time Control report →

IFTTT - Automate work and home

IFTTT, Inc
Google Play
Category
Productivity
Price
Free
Released
Apr 24, 2014
Last updated
May 28, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full IFTTT - Automate work and home report →

Opal: Screen Time Control trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

IFTTT - Automate work and home trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
Opal: Screen Time Control earns about $731.0K per month, while IFTTT - Automate work and home earns about $289.5K. That is a 2.5× revenue gap (~$441.5K more per month for Opal: Screen Time Control). Annual revenue: Opal: Screen Time Control ≈ $8.77M/year, IFTTT - Automate work and home ≈ $3.47M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
IFTTT - Automate work and home leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 9.0M for Opal: Screen Time Control - a 1.1× gap. Opal: Screen Time Control's App Store downloads are estimated from 82K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. IFTTT - Automate work and home reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Opal: Screen Time Control and IFTTT - Automate work and home in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Opal: Screen Time Control and IFTTT - Automate work and home offer? v
Opal: Screen Time Control: IAP range 5 tiers detected. IFTTT - Automate work and home: IAP range $3.99 - $169.99 per item. Opal: Screen Time Control runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; IFTTT - Automate work and home runs "Subscription (~$26.04/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home? v
Opal: Screen Time Control edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 1.5 stars). Rating volume: Opal: Screen Time Control 82K ratings, IFTTT - Automate work and home 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Opal: Screen Time Control vs IFTTT - Automate work and home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $731.0K for Opal: Screen Time Control and $289.5K for IFTTT - Automate work and home are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Opal: Screen Time Control or IFTTT - Automate work and home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.