PAM Hotels vs Timeshifter
PAM Hotels
RCD Hotels
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 700 installs
VS
Timeshifter
Timeshifter Inc.
App Store
$12.0K/mo
~$143.8K/yr · 204K installs
Revenue winner
Timeshifter wins
+1198200% vs other
Installs winner
Timeshifter wins
+29054% vs other
MAU winner
Timeshifter wins
+37005% vs other
Rating winner
Timeshifter wins
+184% vs other
Why Timeshifter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Timeshifter earns roughly 11982× more per month than PAM Hotels - $12.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Timeshifter runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; PAM Hotels relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Timeshifter has ~204K lifetime installs vs PAM Hotels's ~700 - 291.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Timeshifter runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Timeshifter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
PAM Hotels
vs
Timeshifter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$12.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$143.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
700
▶
204K
Monthly active users (est.)?
100.1
▶
37K
App Store rating
1.64★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
14
▶
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
3 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 19, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 90.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.2.50
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 20, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 14, 2026
- File size
- 63.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.5.0
- Languages
- English
PAM Hotels trajectory
Timeshifter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, PAM Hotels or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter earns about $12.0K per month, while PAM Hotels earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$12.0K more per month for Timeshifter). Annual revenue: PAM Hotels ≈ $0/year, Timeshifter ≈ $143.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, PAM Hotels or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter leads with about 204K estimated downloads vs 700 for PAM Hotels - a 291.5× gap. PAM Hotels's App Store downloads are estimated from 14 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Timeshifter's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings.
Are PAM Hotels and Timeshifter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do PAM Hotels and Timeshifter offer? v
PAM Hotels: no IAP detected on the public listing. Timeshifter: IAP range 3 tiers detected. PAM Hotels runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Timeshifter runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, PAM Hotels or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 1.6 (gap of 3.0 stars). Rating volume: PAM Hotels 14 ratings, Timeshifter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these PAM Hotels vs Timeshifter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for PAM Hotels and $12.0K for Timeshifter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare PAM Hotels or Timeshifter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.