HobbyGo Franche-Comté vs Passtime
HobbyGo Franche-Comté
Johnny Andre
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Passtime
HPCR Entreprise
App Store
$35/mo
~$418/yr · 700 installs
Revenue winner
Passtime wins
+3500% vs other
Installs winner
Passtime wins
+70000% vs other
MAU winner
Passtime wins
+12740% vs other
Rating winner
Passtime wins
+464% vs other
Why Passtime is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Passtime earns roughly 35× more per month than HobbyGo Franche-Comté - $35 vs $0.
- Bigger install base. Passtime has ~700 lifetime installs vs HobbyGo Franche-Comté's ~0 - 700.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Passtime sits at 4.64★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Passtime report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$35
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$418
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
700
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
127.4
App Store rating
-
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
0
▶
14
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.49
=
$8.49
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 27, 2021
- Last updated
- Dec 9, 2025
- File size
- 60.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 8.2.316
- Languages
- French
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 4, 2017
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 38.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.0.25
- Languages
- English, French
HobbyGo Franche-Comté trajectory
Passtime trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, HobbyGo Franche-Comté or Passtime? v
Passtime earns about $35 per month, while HobbyGo Franche-Comté earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$35 more per month for Passtime). Annual revenue: HobbyGo Franche-Comté ≈ $0/year, Passtime ≈ $418/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, HobbyGo Franche-Comté or Passtime? v
Passtime leads with about 700 estimated downloads vs 0 for HobbyGo Franche-Comté - a ∞× gap. HobbyGo Franche-Comté's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Passtime's App Store downloads are estimated from 14 ratings.
Are HobbyGo Franche-Comté and Passtime in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Shopping category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do HobbyGo Franche-Comté and Passtime offer? v
HobbyGo Franche-Comté: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Passtime: IAP range 3 tiers detected. HobbyGo Franche-Comté runs a "Subscription (~$8.49/mo)" monetization model; Passtime runs "Subscription (~$8.49/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, HobbyGo Franche-Comté or Passtime? v
Passtime edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: HobbyGo Franche-Comté 0 ratings, Passtime 14 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these HobbyGo Franche-Comté vs Passtime revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for HobbyGo Franche-Comté and $35 for Passtime are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Shopping) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare HobbyGo Franche-Comté or Passtime to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
