Performance Direct Insurance vs Microsoft Teams

Performance Direct Insurance

Grove & Dean Ltd
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Corporation
Google Play
$5.65M/mo
~$67.78M/yr · 618.3M installs
Revenue winner Microsoft Teams wins +564843600% vs other
Installs winner Microsoft Teams wins +61829542000% vs other
MAU winner Microsoft Teams wins +989272672% vs other
Rating winner Microsoft Teams wins +463% vs other

Why Microsoft Teams is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Microsoft Teams earns roughly 5648436× more per month than Performance Direct Insurance - $5.65M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Microsoft Teams runs a $36.04/mo subscription that compounds; Performance Direct Insurance relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Microsoft Teams has ~618.3M lifetime installs vs Performance Direct Insurance's ~0 - 618295420.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Microsoft Teams sits at 4.63★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Microsoft Teams report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Performance Direct Insurance
vs
Microsoft Teams
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$5.65M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$67.78M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
618.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
9.9M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
0
▶
8.7M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$36.04
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Performance Direct Insurance

Grove & Dean Ltd
App Store
Category
Business
Price
Free
Released
Oct 30, 2021
Last updated
Dec 12, 2025
File size
73.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.0.27
Languages
-
View full Performance Direct Insurance report →

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Corporation
Google Play
Category
Business
Price
Free
Released
Nov 2, 2016
Last updated
Jun 15, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1416/1.0.0.2026112702
Languages
-
View full Microsoft Teams report →

Performance Direct Insurance trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Microsoft Teams trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Related app pages

Performance Direct Insurance App Store page →Microsoft Teams Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Performance Direct Insurance iOS vs Linkedin Community Network AndroidPerformance Direct Insurance iOS vs Giga Miner Bitcoin Miner Cloud AndroidPerformance Direct Insurance iOS vs Microsoft Authenticator AndroidPerformance Direct Insurance iOS vs Indeed Job Search AndroidPerformance Direct Insurance iOS vs Invoice Simple Invoice Maker AndroidPerformance Direct Insurance iOS vs Intuit Quickbooks for Business Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Performance Direct Insurance or Microsoft Teams? v
Microsoft Teams earns about $5.65M per month, while Performance Direct Insurance earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.65M more per month for Microsoft Teams). Annual revenue: Performance Direct Insurance ≈ $0/year, Microsoft Teams ≈ $67.78M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Performance Direct Insurance or Microsoft Teams? v
Microsoft Teams leads with about 618.3M estimated downloads vs 0 for Performance Direct Insurance - a ∞× gap. Performance Direct Insurance's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Microsoft Teams reports 500,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Performance Direct Insurance and Microsoft Teams in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Business category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Performance Direct Insurance and Microsoft Teams offer? v
Performance Direct Insurance: no IAP detected on the public listing. Microsoft Teams: IAP range $9.99 - $129.99 per item. Performance Direct Insurance runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Microsoft Teams runs "Subscription (~$36.04/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Performance Direct Insurance or Microsoft Teams? v
Microsoft Teams edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: Performance Direct Insurance 0 ratings, Microsoft Teams 96K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Performance Direct Insurance vs Microsoft Teams revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Performance Direct Insurance and $5.65M for Microsoft Teams are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Performance Direct Insurance or Microsoft Teams to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.