Pets at Home: Medical Tracker vs Pets at Home

Pets at Home: Medical Tracker

Chingiz Zholdaspayev
App Store
$29/mo
~$350/yr · 2K installs
VS

Pets at Home

Pets at Home
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 4.8M installs
Revenue winner Pets at Home: Medical Tracker wins +2900% vs other
Installs winner Pets at Home wins +319381% vs other
MAU winner Pets at Home wins +134557% vs other
Rating winner Pets at Home: Medical Tracker wins +82% vs other

Why Pets at Home: Medical Tracker is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Pets at Home: Medical Tracker earns roughly 29× more per month than Pets at Home - $29 vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Pets at Home: Medical Tracker runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; Pets at Home relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Better app store reviews. Pets at Home: Medical Tracker sits at 5.00★ vs 2.75★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pets at Home: Medical Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Pets at Home: Medical Tracker
vs
Pets at Home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$29
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$350
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
4.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
181.5
244K
App Store rating
5.00★
2.75★
Total ratings
1
59K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
0 tiers

Pets at Home: Medical Tracker

Chingiz Zholdaspayev
App Store
Category
Lifestyle
Price
Free
Released
May 20, 2026
Last updated
Jun 10, 2026
File size
10.0 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.1
Languages
English
View full Pets at Home: Medical Tracker report →

Pets at Home

Pets at Home
Google Play
Category
Lifestyle
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.1.3648
Languages
-
View full Pets at Home report →

Pets at Home: Medical Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Pets at Home trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Pets at Home: Medical Tracker or Pets at Home? v
Pets at Home: Medical Tracker earns about $29 per month, while Pets at Home earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$29 more per month for Pets at Home: Medical Tracker). Annual revenue: Pets at Home: Medical Tracker ≈ $350/year, Pets at Home ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Pets at Home: Medical Tracker or Pets at Home? v
Pets at Home leads with about 4.8M estimated downloads vs 2K for Pets at Home: Medical Tracker - a 3194.8× gap. Pets at Home: Medical Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Pets at Home reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Pets at Home: Medical Tracker and Pets at Home in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Pets at Home: Medical Tracker and Pets at Home offer? v
Pets at Home: Medical Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Pets at Home: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pets at Home: Medical Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$4.99/mo)" monetization model; Pets at Home runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Pets at Home: Medical Tracker or Pets at Home? v
Pets at Home: Medical Tracker edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 2.8 (gap of 2.3 stars). Rating volume: Pets at Home: Medical Tracker 1 ratings, Pets at Home 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Pets at Home: Medical Tracker vs Pets at Home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $29 for Pets at Home: Medical Tracker and $0 for Pets at Home are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Pets at Home: Medical Tracker or Pets at Home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.