PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理

ライフログテクノロジー株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 666K installs
VS

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

Liviet
Google Play
$31.2K/mo
~$374.9K/yr · 285K installs
Revenue winner SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins +3123900% vs other
Installs winner PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 wins +134% vs other
MAU winner PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 wins +123% vs other
Rating winner SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins +16% vs other

Why SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns roughly 31239× more per month than PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - $31.2K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs a $6.47/mo subscription that compounds; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Better app store reviews. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker sits at 4.65★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$31.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$374.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
666K
285K
Monthly active users (est.)?
122K
55K
App Store rating
4.00★
4.65★
Total ratings
6K
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$6.47
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理

ライフログテクノロジー株式会社
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 14, 2017
Last updated
Apr 16, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Teen
Version
2.5.13
Languages
-
View full PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 report →

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

Liviet
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 12, 2019
Last updated
May 9, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Mature 17+
Version
2.315
Languages
-
View full SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker report →

PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $31.2K per month, while PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$31.2K more per month for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker). Annual revenue: PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 ≈ $0/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $374.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 leads with about 666K estimated downloads vs 285K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - a 2.3× gap. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理: no IAP detected on the public listing. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range $3.49 - $11.99 per item. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$6.47/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 4 ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 and $31.2K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.