Philips Hue vs TP-Link Tapo
Philips Hue
Signify Netherlands B.V.
App Store
$365.1K/mo
~$4.38M/yr · 16.0M installs
VS
TP-Link Tapo
TP-Link Systems Inc.
App Store
$44.1K/mo
~$528.6K/yr · 2.0M installs
Revenue winner
Philips Hue wins
+729% vs other
Installs winner
Philips Hue wins
+715% vs other
MAU winner
Philips Hue wins
+503% vs other
Rating winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+3% vs other
Why Philips Hue is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Philips Hue earns roughly 8× more per month than TP-Link Tapo - $365.1K vs $44.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. Philips Hue undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $2.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Philips Hue has ~16.0M lifetime installs vs TP-Link Tapo's ~2.0M - 8.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Philips Hue report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$365.1K
◀
$44.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.38M
◀
$528.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.0M
◀
2.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
233K
App Store rating
4.67★
▶
4.82★
Total ratings
107K
◀
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
▶
$2.49
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- 248.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.66.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +13 more
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 16, 2019
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 1.12 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.18.502
- Languages
- Arabic, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +27 more
Philips Hue trajectory
TP-Link Tapo trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
Philips Hue earns about $365.1K per month, while TP-Link Tapo earns about $44.1K. That is a 8.3× revenue gap (~$321.1K more per month for Philips Hue). Annual revenue: Philips Hue ≈ $4.38M/year, TP-Link Tapo ≈ $528.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
Philips Hue leads with about 16.0M estimated downloads vs 2.0M for TP-Link Tapo - a 8.2× gap. Philips Hue's App Store downloads are estimated from 107K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TP-Link Tapo's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are Philips Hue and TP-Link Tapo in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Philips Hue and TP-Link Tapo offer? v
Philips Hue: IAP range 7 tiers detected. TP-Link Tapo: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Philips Hue runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)" monetization model; TP-Link Tapo runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
TP-Link Tapo edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Philips Hue 107K ratings, TP-Link Tapo 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Philips Hue vs TP-Link Tapo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $365.1K for Philips Hue and $44.1K for TP-Link Tapo are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
