Philips Hue vs TP-Link Tapo
Philips Hue
Signify Netherlands B.V.
App Store
$375.1K/mo
~$4.50M/yr · 16.4M installs
VS
TP-Link Tapo
TP-Link Systems Inc.
App Store
$46.9K/mo
~$562.3K/yr · 2.1M installs
Revenue winner
Philips Hue wins
+701% vs other
Installs winner
Philips Hue wins
+687% vs other
MAU winner
Philips Hue wins
+482% vs other
Rating winner
TP-Link Tapo wins
+3% vs other
Why Philips Hue is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Philips Hue earns roughly 8× more per month than TP-Link Tapo - $375.1K vs $46.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Philips Hue undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $2.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Philips Hue has ~16.4M lifetime installs vs TP-Link Tapo's ~2.1M - 7.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Philips Hue report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$375.1K
◀
$46.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.50M
◀
$562.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.4M
◀
2.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
248K
App Store rating
4.68★
▶
4.82★
Total ratings
109K
◀
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
▶
$2.49
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 253.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.70.1
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +13 more
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 16, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- 1.17 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.19.605
- Languages
- Arabic, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +27 more
Philips Hue trajectory
TP-Link Tapo trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
Philips Hue earns about $375.1K per month, while TP-Link Tapo earns about $46.9K. That is a 8.0× revenue gap (~$328.3K more per month for Philips Hue). Annual revenue: Philips Hue ≈ $4.50M/year, TP-Link Tapo ≈ $562.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
Philips Hue leads with about 16.4M estimated downloads vs 2.1M for TP-Link Tapo - a 7.9× gap. Philips Hue's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TP-Link Tapo's App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings.
Are Philips Hue and TP-Link Tapo in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Philips Hue and TP-Link Tapo offer? v
Philips Hue: IAP range 7 tiers detected. TP-Link Tapo: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Philips Hue runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)" monetization model; TP-Link Tapo runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo? v
TP-Link Tapo edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Philips Hue 109K ratings, TP-Link Tapo 19K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Philips Hue vs TP-Link Tapo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $375.1K for Philips Hue and $46.9K for TP-Link Tapo are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Philips Hue or TP-Link Tapo to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
