Photo Recovery&File Restorer vs RAR
Photo Recovery&File Restorer
GUANGSHENG LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
RAR
RARLAB (published by win.rar GmbH)
Google Play
$224.5K/mo
~$2.69M/yr · 248.0M installs
Revenue winner
RAR wins
+22452400% vs other
Installs winner
RAR wins
+19176% vs other
MAU winner
RAR wins
+5311% vs other
Rating winner
RAR wins
+0% vs other
Why RAR is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- RAR earns roughly 224524× more per month than Photo Recovery&File Restorer - $224.5K vs $0.
- Subscription model. RAR runs a $1.57/mo subscription that compounds; Photo Recovery&File Restorer relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. RAR has ~248.0M lifetime installs vs Photo Recovery&File Restorer's ~1.3M - 192.8× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$224.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$2.69M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
▶
248.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
73K
▶
4.0M
App Store rating
4.15★
▶
4.16★
Total ratings
985
▶
886K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$1.57
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 12, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 15, 2014
- Last updated
- Jan 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.20.build131
- Languages
- -
Photo Recovery&File Restorer trajectory
RAR trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Photo Recovery&File Restorer or RAR? v
RAR earns about $224.5K per month, while Photo Recovery&File Restorer earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$224.5K more per month for RAR). Annual revenue: Photo Recovery&File Restorer ≈ $0/year, RAR ≈ $2.69M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Photo Recovery&File Restorer or RAR? v
RAR leads with about 248.0M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for Photo Recovery&File Restorer - a 192.8× gap. Photo Recovery&File Restorer reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. RAR reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Photo Recovery&File Restorer and RAR in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Photo Recovery&File Restorer and RAR offer? v
Photo Recovery&File Restorer: no IAP detected on the public listing. RAR: IAP range $0.99 - $2.49 per item. Photo Recovery&File Restorer runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; RAR runs "Subscription (~$1.57/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Photo Recovery&File Restorer or RAR? v
RAR edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Photo Recovery&File Restorer 7 ratings, RAR 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Photo Recovery&File Restorer vs RAR revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Photo Recovery&File Restorer and $224.5K for RAR are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Photo Recovery&File Restorer or RAR to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
