BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer vs PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer
BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer
KallosSoft.com
App Store
$6.0K/mo
~$72.1K/yr · 285K installs
VS
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer
MTTech Ltd.
Google Play
$534.0K/mo
~$6.41M/yr · 8.8M installs
Revenue winner
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer wins
+8785% vs other
Installs winner
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer wins
+2999% vs other
MAU winner
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer wins
+1415% vs other
Rating winner
BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer wins
+7% vs other
Why PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer earns roughly 89× more per month than BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer - $534.0K vs $6.0K.
- Premium pricing. PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer charges $9.95/mo vs BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer's $4.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer has ~8.8M lifetime installs vs BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer's ~285K - 31.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$6.0K
▶
$534.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$72.1K
▶
$6.41M
Lifetime installs (est.)
285K
▶
8.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
89K
▶
1.4M
App Store rating
4.57★
◀
4.27★
Total ratings
4K
▶
140K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$9.95
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 22, 2021
- Last updated
- May 29, 2026
- File size
- 155.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.81
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 22, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 3.7.01
- Languages
- -
BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer trajectory
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer or PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer? v
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer earns about $534.0K per month, while BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer earns about $6.0K. That is a 88.9× revenue gap (~$528.0K more per month for PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer). Annual revenue: BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer ≈ $72.1K/year, PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer ≈ $6.41M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer or PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer? v
PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer leads with about 8.8M estimated downloads vs 285K for BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer - a 31.0× gap. BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer and PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
No - BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer is in Photo & Video and PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer is in Photography. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer from photo & video monetization patterns, PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer from photography.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer and PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer offer? v
BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer: IAP range 8 tiers detected. PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer: IAP range $0.99 - $99.99 per item. BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer runs a "Subscription (~$2.08/mo)" monetization model; PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer runs "Subscription (~$9.95/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer or PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer? v
BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer 4K ratings, PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer vs PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $6.0K for BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer and $534.0K for PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video / Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BlurBuster - AI Photo Enhancer or PicMa: AI Video&Photo Enhancer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
