Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video vs SODA - Natural Beauty Camera
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
PicsArt, Inc.
Google Play
$23.70M/mo
~$284.37M/yr · 1.4B installs
VS
SODA - Natural Beauty Camera
SNOW Corporation
Google Play
$1.84M/mo
~$22.12M/yr · 44.1M installs
Revenue winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+1186% vs other
Installs winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+3113% vs other
MAU winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+1171% vs other
Rating winner
SODA - Natural Beauty Camera wins
+5% vs other
Why Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns roughly 13× more per month than SODA - Natural Beauty Camera - $23.70M vs $1.84M.
- Aggressive pricing. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video undercuts at $14.76/mo vs $24.48/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video has ~1.4B lifetime installs vs SODA - Natural Beauty Camera's ~44.1M - 32.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$23.70M
◀
$1.84M
Annual revenue (est.)
$284.37M
◀
$22.12M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.4B
◀
44.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
51.0M
◀
4.0M
App Store rating
4.01★
▶
4.19★
Total ratings
12.2M
◀
180K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.76
▶
$24.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 4, 2011
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 30.2.6
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 10, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video trajectory
SODA - Natural Beauty Camera trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video or SODA - Natural Beauty Camera? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns about $23.70M per month, while SODA - Natural Beauty Camera earns about $1.84M. That is a 12.9× revenue gap (~$21.85M more per month for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video). Annual revenue: Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video ≈ $284.37M/year, SODA - Natural Beauty Camera ≈ $22.12M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video or SODA - Natural Beauty Camera? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video leads with about 1.4B estimated downloads vs 44.1M for SODA - Natural Beauty Camera - a 32.1× gap. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video reports 1,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play. SODA - Natural Beauty Camera reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video and SODA - Natural Beauty Camera in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video and SODA - Natural Beauty Camera offer? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video: IAP range $0.99 - $219.99 per item. SODA - Natural Beauty Camera: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video runs a "Subscription (~$14.76/mo, ai)" monetization model; SODA - Natural Beauty Camera runs "Subscription (~$24.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video or SODA - Natural Beauty Camera? v
SODA - Natural Beauty Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video 442K ratings, SODA - Natural Beauty Camera 491 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video vs SODA - Natural Beauty Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $23.70M for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video and $1.84M for SODA - Natural Beauty Camera are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video or SODA - Natural Beauty Camera to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
