PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver vs QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver
PIKCLOUD PTE. LTD.
App Store
$299/mo
~$3.6K/yr · 11K installs
VS
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 91K installs
Revenue winner
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver wins
+29900% vs other
Installs winner
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 wins
+752% vs other
MAU winner
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 wins
+834% vs other
Rating winner
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 wins
+39% vs other
Why PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver earns roughly 299× more per month than QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 - $299 vs $0.
- Subscription model. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver
vs
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$299
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.6K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
11K
▶
91K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
10K
App Store rating
3.01★
▶
4.19★
Total ratings
214
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 172.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.0.0
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese +3 more
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2010
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 503.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 20.3.5
- Languages
- English, Chinese
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver trajectory
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver or QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿? v
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver earns about $299 per month, while QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$299 more per month for PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver). Annual revenue: PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver ≈ $3.6K/year, QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver or QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿? v
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 leads with about 91K estimated downloads vs 11K for PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver - a 8.5× gap. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver's App Store downloads are estimated from 214 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver and QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver and QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 offer? v
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver: IAP range 5 tiers detected. QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿: no IAP detected on the public listing. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver or QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿? v
QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver 214 ratings, QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver vs QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $299 for PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver and $0 for QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver or QQ浏览器-高考AI填志愿 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.