Places: Curated Discovery vs Stakeout
Places: Curated Discovery
Raya App Inc
App Store
$5.8K/mo
~$69.9K/yr · 4K installs
VS
Stakeout
Wildcard Software LLC
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 537K installs
Revenue winner
Places: Curated Discovery wins
+582300% vs other
Installs winner
Stakeout wins
+12529% vs other
MAU winner
Stakeout wins
+6775% vs other
Rating winner
Stakeout wins
+14% vs other
Why Places: Curated Discovery is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Places: Curated Discovery earns roughly 5823× more per month than Stakeout - $5.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Places: Curated Discovery runs a $30.00/mo subscription that compounds; Stakeout relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Places: Curated Discovery report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$69.9K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
▶
537K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
99K
App Store rating
4.26★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
170
▶
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$30.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 24, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 244.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.70.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 22, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 58.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 7.0.1
- Languages
- English
Places: Curated Discovery trajectory
Stakeout trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Places: Curated Discovery or Stakeout? v
Places: Curated Discovery earns about $5.8K per month, while Stakeout earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.8K more per month for Places: Curated Discovery). Annual revenue: Places: Curated Discovery ≈ $69.9K/year, Stakeout ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Places: Curated Discovery or Stakeout? v
Stakeout leads with about 537K estimated downloads vs 4K for Places: Curated Discovery - a 126.3× gap. Places: Curated Discovery's App Store downloads are estimated from 170 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Stakeout's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings.
Are Places: Curated Discovery and Stakeout in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Places: Curated Discovery and Stakeout have in-app purchases? v
Places: Curated Discovery does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Stakeout does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Places: Curated Discovery runs "Subscription (~$30.00/mo, dating)", Stakeout runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Places: Curated Discovery or Stakeout? v
Stakeout edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Places: Curated Discovery 170 ratings, Stakeout 7K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Places: Curated Discovery vs Stakeout revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.8K for Places: Curated Discovery and $0 for Stakeout are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Places: Curated Discovery or Stakeout to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
