Fasting Tracker App vs Plan to Eat
Fasting Tracker App
Drama Labs GmbH
App Store
$833/mo
~$10.0K/yr · 34K installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+910% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+1315% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+2086% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+3% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 10× more per month than Fasting Tracker App - $8.4K vs $833.
- Aggressive pricing. Plan to Eat undercuts at $4.58/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~476K lifetime installs vs Fasting Tracker App's ~34K - 14.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$833
▶
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$10.0K
▶
$100.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
34K
▶
476K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
57K
App Store rating
4.68★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
673
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 3, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 8, 2022
- File size
- 60.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 4.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Fasting Tracker App trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fasting Tracker App or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Fasting Tracker App earns about $833. That is a 10.1× revenue gap (~$7.6K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Fasting Tracker App ≈ $10.0K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fasting Tracker App or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 476K estimated downloads vs 34K for Fasting Tracker App - a 14.1× gap. Fasting Tracker App's App Store downloads are estimated from 673 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Fasting Tracker App and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fasting Tracker App and Plan to Eat offer? v
Fasting Tracker App: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fasting Tracker App runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fasting Tracker App or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fasting Tracker App 673 ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fasting Tracker App vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $833 for Fasting Tracker App and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fasting Tracker App or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
