Plan to Eat vs IRCTC eCatering Food on Track
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
VS
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track
IRCTC Official
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 9.4M installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+841200% vs other
Installs winner
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track wins
+1874% vs other
MAU winner
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track wins
+862% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+11% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 8412× more per month than IRCTC eCatering Food on Track - $8.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Plan to Eat runs a $4.58/mo subscription that compounds; IRCTC eCatering Food on Track relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Plan to Eat sits at 4.84★ vs 4.38★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Plan to Eat
vs
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.4K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$100.9K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
476K
▶
9.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
57K
▶
545K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.38★
Total ratings
6K
▶
99K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 10, 2015
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.25.5
- Languages
- -
Plan to Eat trajectory
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or IRCTC eCatering Food on Track? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while IRCTC eCatering Food on Track earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.4K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year, IRCTC eCatering Food on Track ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or IRCTC eCatering Food on Track? v
IRCTC eCatering Food on Track leads with about 9.4M estimated downloads vs 476K for Plan to Eat - a 19.7× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. IRCTC eCatering Food on Track reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Plan to Eat and IRCTC eCatering Food on Track in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and IRCTC eCatering Food on Track offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. IRCTC eCatering Food on Track: no IAP detected on the public listing. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; IRCTC eCatering Food on Track runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or IRCTC eCatering Food on Track? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, IRCTC eCatering Food on Track 20 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs IRCTC eCatering Food on Track revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.4K for Plan to Eat and $0 for IRCTC eCatering Food on Track are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or IRCTC eCatering Food on Track to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.