Plan to Eat vs Lucky Sushi
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
VS
Lucky Sushi
TR3SCO
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 295K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+841200% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+61% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+129% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+484% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 8412× more per month than Lucky Sushi - $8.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Plan to Eat runs a $4.58/mo subscription that compounds; Lucky Sushi relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~476K lifetime installs vs Lucky Sushi's ~295K - 1.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Plan to Eat sits at 4.84★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.4K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$100.9K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
476K
◀
295K
Monthly active users (est.)?
57K
◀
25K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
-
Total ratings
6K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Dec 3, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.5.9
- Languages
- -
Plan to Eat trajectory
Lucky Sushi trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or Lucky Sushi? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Lucky Sushi earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.4K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year, Lucky Sushi ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or Lucky Sushi? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 476K estimated downloads vs 295K for Lucky Sushi - a 1.6× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lucky Sushi reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Plan to Eat and Lucky Sushi in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and Lucky Sushi offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Lucky Sushi: no IAP detected on the public listing. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; Lucky Sushi runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or Lucky Sushi? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, Lucky Sushi 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs Lucky Sushi revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.4K for Plan to Eat and $0 for Lucky Sushi are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or Lucky Sushi to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
