Pam Fitness & Food vs Plan to Eat
Pam Fitness & Food
PLR UG
App Store
$4.8K/mo
~$57.6K/yr · 89K installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+75% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+432% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+432% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+1% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 2× more per month than Pam Fitness & Food - $8.4K vs $4.8K.
- Premium pricing. Plan to Eat charges $4.58/mo vs Pam Fitness & Food's $1.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~476K lifetime installs vs Pam Fitness & Food's ~89K - 5.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Pam Fitness & Food
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.8K
▶
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$57.6K
▶
$100.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
89K
▶
476K
Monthly active users (est.)?
11K
▶
57K
App Store rating
4.78★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
1K
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
▶
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 23, 2021
- Last updated
- Jan 27, 2026
- File size
- 53.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.2.4
- Languages
- English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Pam Fitness & Food trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Pam Fitness & Food or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Pam Fitness & Food earns about $4.8K. That is a 1.8× revenue gap (~$3.6K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Pam Fitness & Food ≈ $57.6K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Pam Fitness & Food or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 476K estimated downloads vs 89K for Pam Fitness & Food - a 5.3× gap. Pam Fitness & Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Pam Fitness & Food and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Pam Fitness & Food and Plan to Eat offer? v
Pam Fitness & Food: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Pam Fitness & Food runs a "Subscription (~$13.99/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Pam Fitness & Food or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Pam Fitness & Food 1K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Pam Fitness & Food vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.8K for Pam Fitness & Food and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Pam Fitness & Food or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.