Plan to Eat vs RamenDays
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.9K/yr · 476K installs
VS
RamenDays
Clear Inc.
App Store
$3/mo
~$35/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+280300% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+118900% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+124119% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+16% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 2804× more per month than RamenDays - $8.4K vs $3.
- Premium pricing. Plan to Eat charges $4.58/mo vs RamenDays's $1.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~476K lifetime installs vs RamenDays's ~400 - 1190.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Plan to Eat sits at 4.84★ vs 4.17★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Plan to Eat
vs
RamenDays
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.4K
◀
$3
Annual revenue (est.)
$100.9K
◀
$35
Lifetime installs (est.)
476K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
57K
◀
45.6
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.17★
Total ratings
6K
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
◀
$1.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 12, 2014
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 109.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 8.9.1
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Chinese, Chinese
Plan to Eat trajectory
RamenDays trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or RamenDays? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while RamenDays earns about $3. That is a 2804.0× revenue gap (~$8.4K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $100.9K/year, RamenDays ≈ $35/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or RamenDays? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 476K estimated downloads vs 400 for RamenDays - a 1190.0× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. RamenDays's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are Plan to Eat and RamenDays in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and RamenDays offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. RamenDays: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; RamenDays runs "Subscription (~$1.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or RamenDays? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, RamenDays 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs RamenDays revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.4K for Plan to Eat and $3 for RamenDays are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or RamenDays to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.