Plan to Eat vs ResX
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
VS
ResX
ResX
App Store
$696/mo
~$8.3K/yr · 18K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+1107% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+2498% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+2520% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+4% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 12× more per month than ResX - $8.4K vs $696.
- Aggressive pricing. Plan to Eat undercuts at $4.58/mo vs $14.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~475K lifetime installs vs ResX's ~18K - 26.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.4K
◀
$696
Annual revenue (est.)
$100.8K
◀
$8.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
475K
◀
18K
Monthly active users (est.)?
57K
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
6K
◀
366
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
▶
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2023
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 127.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.8.19
- Languages
- English
Plan to Eat trajectory
ResX trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or ResX? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while ResX earns about $696. That is a 12.1× revenue gap (~$7.7K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year, ResX ≈ $8.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or ResX? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 475K estimated downloads vs 18K for ResX - a 26.0× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ResX's App Store downloads are estimated from 364 ratings.
Are Plan to Eat and ResX in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and ResX offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. ResX: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; ResX runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or ResX? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, ResX 364 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs ResX revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.4K for Plan to Eat and $696 for ResX are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or ResX to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
