Plan to Eat vs Sakenowa
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
VS
Sakenowa
Aiiro Systems Inc.
App Store
$12/mo
~$149/yr · 550 installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+69900% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+86329% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+87807% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+6% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 700× more per month than Sakenowa - $8.4K vs $12.
- Aggressive pricing. Plan to Eat undercuts at $4.58/mo vs $5.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~475K lifetime installs vs Sakenowa's ~550 - 864.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.4K
◀
$12
Annual revenue (est.)
$100.8K
◀
$149
Lifetime installs (est.)
475K
◀
550
Monthly active users (est.)?
57K
◀
64.35
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.55★
Total ratings
6K
◀
11
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
▶
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 22, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- 39.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.52
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Chinese
Plan to Eat trajectory
Sakenowa trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or Sakenowa? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Sakenowa earns about $12. That is a 700.0× revenue gap (~$8.4K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year, Sakenowa ≈ $149/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or Sakenowa? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 475K estimated downloads vs 550 for Sakenowa - a 864.3× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Sakenowa's App Store downloads are estimated from 11 ratings.
Are Plan to Eat and Sakenowa in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and Sakenowa offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Sakenowa: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; Sakenowa runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or Sakenowa? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, Sakenowa 11 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs Sakenowa revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.4K for Plan to Eat and $12 for Sakenowa are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or Sakenowa to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
