Plan to Eat vs Total Wine & More
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.6K/mo
~$103.0K/yr · 486K installs
VS
Total Wine & More
Retail Services & Systems, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 17.0M installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+858100% vs other
Installs winner
Total Wine & More wins
+3394% vs other
MAU winner
Total Wine & More wins
+2513% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+0% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 8581× more per month than Total Wine & More - $8.6K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Plan to Eat runs a $4.58/mo subscription that compounds; Total Wine & More relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.6K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$103.0K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
486K
▶
17.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
58K
▶
1.5M
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.82★
Total ratings
6K
▶
113K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.58
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 3, 2026
- File size
- 19.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.9
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 9, 2026
- File size
- 151.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 10.6.0
- Languages
- English
Plan to Eat trajectory
Total Wine & More trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Plan to Eat or Total Wine & More? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.6K per month, while Total Wine & More earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.6K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Plan to Eat ≈ $103.0K/year, Total Wine & More ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Plan to Eat or Total Wine & More? v
Total Wine & More leads with about 17.0M estimated downloads vs 486K for Plan to Eat - a 34.9× gap. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Total Wine & More's App Store downloads are estimated from 113K ratings.
Are Plan to Eat and Total Wine & More in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Plan to Eat and Total Wine & More offer? v
Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Total Wine & More: no IAP detected on the public listing. Plan to Eat runs a "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)" monetization model; Total Wine & More runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Plan to Eat or Total Wine & More? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Plan to Eat 6K ratings, Total Wine & More 113K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Plan to Eat vs Total Wine & More revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.6K for Plan to Eat and $0 for Total Wine & More are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Plan to Eat or Total Wine & More to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
