Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor
Polarrcan
Google Play
$1.29M/mo
~$15.46M/yr · 36.9M installs
VS
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter
HDY Studio
Google Play
$1.23M/mo
~$14.76M/yr · 24.3M installs
Revenue winner
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor wins
+5% vs other
Installs winner
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor wins
+52% vs other
MAU winner
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor wins
+45% vs other
Rating winner
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter wins
+17% vs other
Why Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor undercuts at $3.99/mo vs $34.63/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor has ~36.9M lifetime installs vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter's ~24.3M - 1.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor
vs
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.29M
◀
$1.23M
Annual revenue (est.)
$15.46M
◀
$14.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
36.9M
◀
24.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
2.3M
App Store rating
3.80★
▶
4.46★
Total ratings
146K
◀
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
▶
$34.63
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 2, 2015
- Last updated
- Feb 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.12.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 8, 2022
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.1
- Languages
- -
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor trajectory
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor earns about $1.29M per month, while Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter earns about $1.23M. That is a 1.0× revenue gap (~$58.5K more per month for Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor). Annual revenue: Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor ≈ $15.46M/year, Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter ≈ $14.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor leads with about 36.9M estimated downloads vs 24.3M for Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter - a 1.5× gap. Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor and Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor and Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter offer? v
Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor: IAP range $0.99 - $34.99 per item. Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter: IAP range $19.99 - $59.99 per item. Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor runs a "Subscription (~$3.99/mo)" monetization model; Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter runs "Subscription (~$34.63/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor 2K ratings, Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter 417 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.29M for Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor and $1.23M for Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Polarr: Photo Filters & Editor or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.