PreRecCam vs ProCam - Pro Camera
PreRecCam
崇桂 陈
App Store
$85/mo
~$1.0K/yr · 400 installs
VS
ProCam - Pro Camera
Tinkerworks Apps
App Store
$1.03M/mo
~$12.32M/yr · 3.9M installs
Revenue winner
ProCam - Pro Camera wins
+1208018% vs other
Installs winner
ProCam - Pro Camera wins
+963583% vs other
MAU winner
ProCam - Pro Camera wins
+936731% vs other
Rating winner
PreRecCam wins
+8% vs other
Why ProCam - Pro Camera is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- ProCam - Pro Camera earns roughly 12081× more per month than PreRecCam - $1.03M vs $85.
- Bigger install base. ProCam - Pro Camera has ~3.9M lifetime installs vs PreRecCam's ~400 - 9636.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full ProCam - Pro Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$85
▶
$1.03M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.0K
▶
$12.32M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
3.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
129.2
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.61★
Total ratings
2
▶
35K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD7.99
- Released
- May 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 3.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.5
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, Japanese, Korean, Chinese +2 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD9.99
- Released
- Oct 30, 2013
- Last updated
- May 18, 2026
- File size
- 81.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 15.0.2
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
PreRecCam trajectory
ProCam - Pro Camera trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, PreRecCam or ProCam - Pro Camera? v
ProCam - Pro Camera earns about $1.03M per month, while PreRecCam earns about $85. That is a 12081.2× revenue gap (~$1.03M more per month for ProCam - Pro Camera). Annual revenue: PreRecCam ≈ $1.0K/year, ProCam - Pro Camera ≈ $12.32M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, PreRecCam or ProCam - Pro Camera? v
ProCam - Pro Camera leads with about 3.9M estimated downloads vs 400 for PreRecCam - a 9636.8× gap. PreRecCam's App Store downloads are estimated from 2 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ProCam - Pro Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 35K ratings.
Are PreRecCam and ProCam - Pro Camera in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do PreRecCam and ProCam - Pro Camera have in-app purchases? v
PreRecCam does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. ProCam - Pro Camera does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: PreRecCam runs "Paid app ($7.99)", ProCam - Pro Camera runs "Paid app ($9.99)".
Which has better ratings, PreRecCam or ProCam - Pro Camera? v
PreRecCam edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: PreRecCam 2 ratings, ProCam - Pro Camera 35K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these PreRecCam vs ProCam - Pro Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $85 for PreRecCam and $1.03M for ProCam - Pro Camera are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare PreRecCam or ProCam - Pro Camera to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
