Pushing Limits Club vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition

Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition earns about $27.5K per month, while Pushing Limits Club earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$27.5K more per month for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition). Annual revenue: Pushing Limits Club ≈ $0/year, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition ≈ $329.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition leads with about 229K estimated downloads vs 0 for Pushing Limits Club - a ∞× gap. Pushing Limits Club's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Pushing Limits Club: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition: IAP range $9.49 - $94.99 per item. Pushing Limits Club runs a "Subscription (~$7.50/mo)" monetization model; Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition runs "Subscription (~$30.02/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Pushing Limits Club and $27.5K for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.