Q-Park vs TripView
Q-Park
Q-Park
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
TripView
TripView Pty Ltd
Google Play
$34.3K/mo
~$411.6K/yr · 477K installs
Revenue winner
TripView wins
+3430000% vs other
Installs winner
Q-Park wins
+280% vs other
MAU winner
Q-Park wins
+116% vs other
Rating winner
TripView wins
+78% vs other
Why TripView is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TripView earns roughly 34300× more per month than Q-Park - $34.3K vs $0.
- Better app store reviews. TripView sits at 4.76★ vs 2.67★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TripView report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Q-Park
vs
TripView
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$34.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$411.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
477K
Monthly active users (est.)?
141K
◀
65K
App Store rating
2.67★
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
5K
▶
21K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.17.10
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Feb 2, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.5.4
- Languages
- -
Q-Park trajectory
TripView trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Q-Park or TripView? v
TripView earns about $34.3K per month, while Q-Park earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$34.3K more per month for TripView). Annual revenue: Q-Park ≈ $0/year, TripView ≈ $411.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Q-Park or TripView? v
Q-Park leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 477K for TripView - a 3.8× gap. Q-Park reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. TripView reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Q-Park and TripView in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Q-Park and TripView have in-app purchases? v
Q-Park does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. TripView does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Q-Park runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", TripView runs "Paid app ($5.99)".
Which has better ratings, Q-Park or TripView? v
TripView edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 2.1 stars). Rating volume: Q-Park 3 ratings, TripView 110 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Q-Park vs TripView revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Q-Park and $34.3K for TripView are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Q-Park or TripView to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.