Qobuz: Music & Editorial vs Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game
Qobuz: Music & Editorial
Qobuz
App Store
$168.4K/mo
~$2.02M/yr · 2.0M installs
VS
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game
AMANOTES PTE. LTD.
Google Play
$410.6K/mo
~$4.93M/yr · 822.5M installs
Revenue winner
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game wins
+144% vs other
Installs winner
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game wins
+40095% vs other
MAU winner
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game wins
+2548% vs other
Rating winner
Qobuz: Music & Editorial wins
+1% vs other
Why Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game earns roughly 2× more per month than Qobuz: Music & Editorial - $410.6K vs $168.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game undercuts at $7.03/mo vs $12.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game has ~822.5M lifetime installs vs Qobuz: Music & Editorial's ~2.0M - 401.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$168.4K
▶
$410.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.02M
▶
$4.93M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.0M
▶
822.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
870K
▶
23.0M
App Store rating
4.62★
◀
4.59★
Total ratings
19K
▶
3.5M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$7.03
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Music
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 16, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 5, 2026
- File size
- 167.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.7.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese +1 more
- Category
- Music
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 24, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 13.054.101
- Languages
- -
Qobuz: Music & Editorial trajectory
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Qobuz: Music & Editorial or Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game? v
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game earns about $410.6K per month, while Qobuz: Music & Editorial earns about $168.4K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$242.2K more per month for Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game). Annual revenue: Qobuz: Music & Editorial ≈ $2.02M/year, Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game ≈ $4.93M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Qobuz: Music & Editorial or Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game? v
Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game leads with about 822.5M estimated downloads vs 2.0M for Qobuz: Music & Editorial - a 401.9× gap. Qobuz: Music & Editorial's App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game reports 500,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Qobuz: Music & Editorial and Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Qobuz: Music & Editorial and Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game offer? v
Qobuz: Music & Editorial: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game: IAP range $0.99 - $49.99 per item. Qobuz: Music & Editorial runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Qobuz: Music & Editorial or Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game? v
Qobuz: Music & Editorial edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Qobuz: Music & Editorial 19K ratings, Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game 111K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Qobuz: Music & Editorial vs Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $168.4K for Qobuz: Music & Editorial and $410.6K for Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Qobuz: Music & Editorial or Magic Tiles 3™ - Piano Game to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
