QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 vs Shadowrocket
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$3.0K/mo
~$36.2K/yr · 91K installs
VS
Shadowrocket
Shadow Launch Technology Limited
App Store
$101.1K/mo
~$1.21M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner
Shadowrocket wins
+3252% vs other
Installs winner
Shadowrocket wins
+1291% vs other
MAU winner
Shadowrocket wins
+1315% vs other
Rating winner
Shadowrocket wins
+7% vs other
Why Shadowrocket is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Shadowrocket earns roughly 34× more per month than QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 - $101.1K vs $3.0K.
- Bigger install base. Shadowrocket has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器's ~91K - 13.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Shadowrocket report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器
vs
Shadowrocket
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.0K
▶
$101.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$36.2K
▶
$1.21M
Lifetime installs (est.)
91K
▶
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
147K
App Store rating
4.19★
▶
4.48★
Total ratings
1K
▶
12K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2010
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 488.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 20.1.2
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- Apr 14, 2015
- Last updated
- Feb 19, 2026
- File size
- 48.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.2.80
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Chinese, Chinese +1 more
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 trajectory
Shadowrocket trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 or Shadowrocket? v
Shadowrocket earns about $101.1K per month, while QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 earns about $3.0K. That is a 33.5× revenue gap (~$98.1K more per month for Shadowrocket). Annual revenue: QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 ≈ $36.2K/year, Shadowrocket ≈ $1.21M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 or Shadowrocket? v
Shadowrocket leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 91K for QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 - a 13.9× gap. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Shadowrocket's App Store downloads are estimated from 12K ratings.
Are QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 and Shadowrocket in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 and Shadowrocket offer? v
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Shadowrocket: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 runs a "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)" monetization model; Shadowrocket runs "Paid app ($2.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 or Shadowrocket? v
Shadowrocket edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 1K ratings, Shadowrocket 12K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 vs Shadowrocket revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.0K for QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 and $101.1K for Shadowrocket are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 or Shadowrocket to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.