QQ邮箱 vs Coripet
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.5K/yr · 36K installs
VS
Coripet
Coripet
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.2M installs
Revenue winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+287500% vs other
Installs winner
Coripet wins
+3133% vs other
MAU winner
Coripet wins
+1564% vs other
Rating winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+358% vs other
Why QQ邮箱 is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ邮箱 earns roughly 2875× more per month than Coripet - $2.9K vs $0.
- Subscription model. QQ邮箱 runs a $8.99/mo subscription that compounds; Coripet relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. QQ邮箱 sits at 3.58★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
QQ邮箱
vs
Coripet
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.9K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.5K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
36K
▶
1.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
165K
App Store rating
3.58★
◀
-
Total ratings
718
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.43
- Languages
- -
QQ邮箱 trajectory
Coripet trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, QQ邮箱 or Coripet? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while Coripet earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.9K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.5K/year, Coripet ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, QQ邮箱 or Coripet? v
Coripet leads with about 1.2M estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 32.3× gap. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 718 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Coripet reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are QQ邮箱 and Coripet in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do QQ邮箱 and Coripet offer? v
QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Coripet: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ邮箱 runs a "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)" monetization model; Coripet runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, QQ邮箱 or Coripet? v
QQ邮箱 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: QQ邮箱 718 ratings, Coripet 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these QQ邮箱 vs Coripet revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.9K for QQ邮箱 and $0 for Coripet are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare QQ邮箱 or Coripet to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.