HP vs QQ邮箱
HP
HP Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 700.7M installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$35.0K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+291400% vs other
Installs winner
HP wins
+1922230% vs other
MAU winner
HP wins
+167667% vs other
Rating winner
HP wins
+33% vs other
Why QQ邮箱 is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ邮箱 earns roughly 2914× more per month than HP - $2.9K vs $0.
- Subscription model. QQ邮箱 runs a $8.99/mo subscription that compounds; HP relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
HP
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$35.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
700.7M
◀
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
16.8M
◀
10K
App Store rating
4.74★
◀
3.56★
Total ratings
4.1M
◀
729
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 19, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 429.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.2.0
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +23 more
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
HP trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, HP or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while HP earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.9K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: HP ≈ $0/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $35.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, HP or QQ邮箱? v
HP leads with about 700.7M estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 19223.3× gap. HP's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.1M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 729 ratings.
Are HP and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do HP and QQ邮箱 offer? v
HP: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. HP runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, HP or QQ邮箱? v
HP edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: HP 4.1M ratings, QQ邮箱 729 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these HP vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for HP and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare HP or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.