QQ邮箱 vs Land id®
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.5K/yr · 36K installs
VS
Land id®
Land id™
Google Play
$39.4K/mo
~$472.9K/yr · 407K installs
Revenue winner
Land id® wins
+1271% vs other
Installs winner
Land id® wins
+1034% vs other
MAU winner
Land id® wins
+783% vs other
Rating winner
Land id® wins
+15% vs other
Why Land id® is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Land id® earns roughly 14× more per month than QQ邮箱 - $39.4K vs $2.9K.
- Premium pricing. Land id® charges $33.33/mo vs QQ邮箱's $8.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Land id® has ~407K lifetime installs vs QQ邮箱's ~36K - 11.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Land id® sits at 4.10★ vs 3.58★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Land id® report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
QQ邮箱
vs
Land id®
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.9K
▶
$39.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.5K
▶
$472.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
36K
▶
407K
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
88K
App Store rating
3.58★
▶
4.10★
Total ratings
718
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.99
▶
$33.33
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 17, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.36.0
- Languages
- -
QQ邮箱 trajectory
Land id® trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, QQ邮箱 or Land id®? v
Land id® earns about $39.4K per month, while QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K. That is a 13.7× revenue gap (~$36.5K more per month for Land id®). Annual revenue: QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.5K/year, Land id® ≈ $472.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, QQ邮箱 or Land id®? v
Land id® leads with about 407K estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 11.3× gap. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 718 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Land id® reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are QQ邮箱 and Land id® in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do QQ邮箱 and Land id® offer? v
QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Land id®: IAP range $14.99 - $799.99 per item. QQ邮箱 runs a "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)" monetization model; Land id® runs "Subscription (~$33.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, QQ邮箱 or Land id®? v
Land id® edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: QQ邮箱 718 ratings, Land id® 400 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these QQ邮箱 vs Land id® revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.9K for QQ邮箱 and $39.4K for Land id® are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare QQ邮箱 or Land id® to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.