QuickBend: Conduit Bending vs Claude by Anthropic
QuickBend: Conduit Bending
Bret Hardman
App Store
$55.2K/mo
~$662.8K/yr · 296K installs
VS
Claude by Anthropic
Anthropic PBC
Google Play
$9.21M/mo
~$110.57M/yr · 29.8M installs
Revenue winner
Claude by Anthropic wins
+16583% vs other
Installs winner
Claude by Anthropic wins
+9964% vs other
MAU winner
Claude by Anthropic wins
+6065% vs other
Rating winner
QuickBend: Conduit Bending wins
+6% vs other
Why Claude by Anthropic is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Claude by Anthropic earns roughly 167× more per month than QuickBend: Conduit Bending - $9.21M vs $55.2K.
- Subscription model. Claude by Anthropic runs a $70.71/mo subscription that compounds; QuickBend: Conduit Bending relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Claude by Anthropic has ~29.8M lifetime installs vs QuickBend: Conduit Bending's ~296K - 100.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Claude by Anthropic report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
QuickBend: Conduit Bending
vs
Claude by Anthropic
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$55.2K
▶
$9.21M
Annual revenue (est.)
$662.8K
▶
$110.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
296K
▶
29.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
89K
▶
5.5M
App Store rating
4.82★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
4K
▶
428K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$70.71
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- Jul 28, 2015
- Last updated
- Mar 3, 2026
- File size
- 15.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.1.4
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 11, 2024
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.260430.10
- Languages
- -
QuickBend: Conduit Bending trajectory
Claude by Anthropic trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, QuickBend: Conduit Bending or Claude by Anthropic? v
Claude by Anthropic earns about $9.21M per month, while QuickBend: Conduit Bending earns about $55.2K. That is a 166.8× revenue gap (~$9.16M more per month for Claude by Anthropic). Annual revenue: QuickBend: Conduit Bending ≈ $662.8K/year, Claude by Anthropic ≈ $110.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, QuickBend: Conduit Bending or Claude by Anthropic? v
Claude by Anthropic leads with about 29.8M estimated downloads vs 296K for QuickBend: Conduit Bending - a 100.6× gap. QuickBend: Conduit Bending's App Store downloads are estimated from 4K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Claude by Anthropic reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are QuickBend: Conduit Bending and Claude by Anthropic in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do QuickBend: Conduit Bending and Claude by Anthropic offer? v
QuickBend: Conduit Bending: no IAP detected on the public listing. Claude by Anthropic: IAP range $20.00 - $250.00 per item. QuickBend: Conduit Bending runs a "Paid app ($6.99)" monetization model; Claude by Anthropic runs "Subscription (~$70.71/mo, ai)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, QuickBend: Conduit Bending or Claude by Anthropic? v
QuickBend: Conduit Bending edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: QuickBend: Conduit Bending 4K ratings, Claude by Anthropic 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these QuickBend: Conduit Bending vs Claude by Anthropic revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $55.2K for QuickBend: Conduit Bending and $9.21M for Claude by Anthropic are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare QuickBend: Conduit Bending or Claude by Anthropic to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.