Roman: budget weight loss vs Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
Roman: budget weight loss
Roman Kuryanov
App Store
$7/mo
~$81/yr · 650 installs
VS
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
Too Good To Go
App Store
$3.04M/mo
~$36.49M/yr · 79.8M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+43435943% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+12284115% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+5177545% vs other
Rating winner
Roman: budget weight loss wins
+1% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: Save Good Food is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns roughly 434360× more per month than Roman: budget weight loss - $3.04M vs $7.
- Subscription model. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; Roman: budget weight loss relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food has ~79.8M lifetime installs vs Roman: budget weight loss's ~650 - 122842.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Roman: budget weight loss
vs
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$7
▶
$3.04M
Annual revenue (est.)
$81
▶
$36.49M
Lifetime installs (est.)
650
▶
79.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
78.65
▶
4.1M
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.93★
Total ratings
13
▶
532K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.39
- Released
- Aug 14, 2018
- Last updated
- Jan 20, 2026
- File size
- 17.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.0
- Languages
- English, Russian, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 196.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.6.20
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
Roman: budget weight loss trajectory
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Roman: budget weight loss or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns about $3.04M per month, while Roman: budget weight loss earns about $7. That is a 434360.4× revenue gap (~$3.04M more per month for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food). Annual revenue: Roman: budget weight loss ≈ $81/year, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food ≈ $36.49M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Roman: budget weight loss or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food leads with about 79.8M estimated downloads vs 650 for Roman: budget weight loss - a 122842.2× gap. Roman: budget weight loss's App Store downloads are estimated from 13 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 532K ratings.
Are Roman: budget weight loss and Too Good To Go: Save Good Food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Roman: budget weight loss and Too Good To Go: Save Good Food have in-app purchases? v
Roman: budget weight loss does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Roman: budget weight loss runs "Paid app ($0.39)", Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)".
Which has better ratings, Roman: budget weight loss or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Roman: budget weight loss edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Roman: budget weight loss 13 ratings, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food 532K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Roman: budget weight loss vs Too Good To Go: Save Good Food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $7 for Roman: budget weight loss and $3.04M for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Roman: budget weight loss or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.