Samsung Food: Meal Planner vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Whisk food
App Store
$13.3K/mo
~$159.0K/yr · 494K installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+43128% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+15136% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+12831% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+3% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 432× more per month than Samsung Food: Meal Planner - $5.73M vs $13.3K.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner's $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner's ~494K - 152.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$13.3K
▶
$5.73M
Annual revenue (est.)
$159.0K
▶
$68.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
494K
▶
75.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
59K
▶
7.6M
App Store rating
4.78★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
6K
▶
502K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 15, 2016
- Last updated
- Feb 18, 2026
- File size
- 164.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 5.55.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese +1 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
Samsung Food: Meal Planner trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Samsung Food: Meal Planner or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns about $13.3K. That is a 432.3× revenue gap (~$5.72M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Samsung Food: Meal Planner ≈ $159.0K/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Samsung Food: Meal Planner or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 494K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner - a 152.4× gap. Samsung Food: Meal Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings.
Are Samsung Food: Meal Planner and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Samsung Food: Meal Planner and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Samsung Food: Meal Planner runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Samsung Food: Meal Planner or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Samsung Food: Meal Planner 6K ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Samsung Food: Meal Planner vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $13.3K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner and $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Samsung Food: Meal Planner or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.