SaveTrip vs Tripenai - Travel Planner
SaveTrip
Donghoon Kim
App Store
$60/mo
~$722/yr · 400 installs
VS
Tripenai - Travel Planner
Milad Barazandeh
App Store
$5/mo
~$60/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
SaveTrip wins
+1100% vs other
Installs winnerTied
MAU winnerTied
Rating winnerTied
Why SaveTrip is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- SaveTrip earns roughly 12× more per month than Tripenai - Travel Planner - $60 vs $5.
- Aggressive pricing. SaveTrip undercuts at $1.99/mo vs $3.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- More monetization surfaces. SaveTrip runs 4 IAP tiers vs 2 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full SaveTrip report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$60
◀
$5
Annual revenue (est.)
$722
◀
$60
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
=
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
74.4
=
74.4
App Store rating
5.00★
=
5.00★
Total ratings
3
=
3
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
▶
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2020
- Last updated
- Feb 8, 2026
- File size
- 68.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.50.21
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 14, 2026
- File size
- 77.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.17.3
- Languages
- English
SaveTrip trajectory
Tripenai - Travel Planner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, SaveTrip or Tripenai - Travel Planner? v
SaveTrip earns about $60 per month, while Tripenai - Travel Planner earns about $5. That is a 12.0× revenue gap (~$55 more per month for SaveTrip). Annual revenue: SaveTrip ≈ $722/year, Tripenai - Travel Planner ≈ $60/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, SaveTrip or Tripenai - Travel Planner? v
Tripenai - Travel Planner leads with about 400 estimated downloads vs 400 for SaveTrip - a 1.0× gap. SaveTrip's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Tripenai - Travel Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings.
Are SaveTrip and Tripenai - Travel Planner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do SaveTrip and Tripenai - Travel Planner offer? v
SaveTrip: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Tripenai - Travel Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. SaveTrip runs a "Subscription (~$24.99/mo)" monetization model; Tripenai - Travel Planner runs "Subscription (~$2.08/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, SaveTrip or Tripenai - Travel Planner? v
Tripenai - Travel Planner edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 5.0 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: SaveTrip 3 ratings, Tripenai - Travel Planner 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these SaveTrip vs Tripenai - Travel Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $60 for SaveTrip and $5 for Tripenai - Travel Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare SaveTrip or Tripenai - Travel Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
