Scritchy Scratchy vs Word Search Solitaire
Scritchy Scratchy
Funday Games ApS
App Store
$14.7K/mo
~$176.9K/yr · 79K installs
VS
Word Search Solitaire
PlaySimple Games Pte Ltd
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$35.2K/yr · 733K installs
Revenue winner
Scritchy Scratchy wins
+403% vs other
Installs winner
Word Search Solitaire wins
+827% vs other
MAU winner
Word Search Solitaire wins
+832% vs other
Rating winner
Word Search Solitaire wins
+2% vs other
Why Scritchy Scratchy is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Scritchy Scratchy earns roughly 5× more per month than Word Search Solitaire - $14.7K vs $2.9K.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Scritchy Scratchy report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$14.7K
◀
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$176.9K
◀
$35.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
79K
▶
733K
Monthly active users (est.)?
16K
▶
149K
App Store rating
4.85★
▶
4.95★
Total ratings
719
▶
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- Mar 18, 2026
- Last updated
- May 2, 2026
- File size
- 405.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.1.6
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 28, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 226.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.42
- Languages
- English
Scritchy Scratchy trajectory
Word Search Solitaire trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Scritchy Scratchy or Word Search Solitaire? v
Scritchy Scratchy earns about $14.7K per month, while Word Search Solitaire earns about $2.9K. That is a 5.0× revenue gap (~$11.8K more per month for Scritchy Scratchy). Annual revenue: Scritchy Scratchy ≈ $176.9K/year, Word Search Solitaire ≈ $35.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Scritchy Scratchy or Word Search Solitaire? v
Word Search Solitaire leads with about 733K estimated downloads vs 79K for Scritchy Scratchy - a 9.3× gap. Scritchy Scratchy's App Store downloads are estimated from 703 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Word Search Solitaire's App Store downloads are estimated from 9K ratings.
Are Scritchy Scratchy and Word Search Solitaire in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Scritchy Scratchy and Word Search Solitaire have in-app purchases? v
Scritchy Scratchy does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Word Search Solitaire does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Scritchy Scratchy runs "Paid app ($6.99)", Word Search Solitaire runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)".
Which has better ratings, Scritchy Scratchy or Word Search Solitaire? v
Word Search Solitaire edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Scritchy Scratchy 703 ratings, Word Search Solitaire 9K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Scritchy Scratchy vs Word Search Solitaire revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $14.7K for Scritchy Scratchy and $2.9K for Word Search Solitaire are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Scritchy Scratchy or Word Search Solitaire to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
