Sezzy Timer vs Simple Interval Timer

Sezzy Timer earns about $468 per month, while Simple Interval Timer earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$468 more per month for Sezzy Timer). Annual revenue: Sezzy Timer ≈ $5.6K/year, Simple Interval Timer ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Sezzy Timer leads with about 20K estimated downloads vs 404 for Simple Interval Timer - a 48.5× gap. Sezzy Timer reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Simple Interval Timer reports 100+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Sezzy Timer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Simple Interval Timer does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Sezzy Timer runs "Paid app ($1.99)", Simple Interval Timer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Sezzy Timer edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.7 stars). Rating volume: Sezzy Timer 20 ratings, Simple Interval Timer 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $468 for Sezzy Timer and $0 for Simple Interval Timer are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.