Sezzy Timer vs Basic-Fit
Sezzy Timer
Sarah's Day Pty Limited
App Store
$265/mo
~$3.2K/yr · 5K installs
VS
Basic-Fit
Basic-Fit
Google Play
$468.8K/mo
~$5.63M/yr · 6.0M installs
Revenue winner
Basic-Fit wins
+176791% vs other
Installs winner
Basic-Fit wins
+119706% vs other
MAU winner
Basic-Fit wins
+79577% vs other
Rating winner
Basic-Fit wins
+3% vs other
Why Basic-Fit is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Basic-Fit earns roughly 1769× more per month than Sezzy Timer - $468.8K vs $265.
- Subscription model. Basic-Fit runs a $12.00/mo subscription that compounds; Sezzy Timer relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Basic-Fit has ~6.0M lifetime installs vs Sezzy Timer's ~5K - 1198.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Basic-Fit report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Sezzy Timer
vs
Basic-Fit
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$265
▶
$468.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.2K
▶
$5.63M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5K
▶
6.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
821K
App Store rating
3.88★
▶
4.00★
Total ratings
100
▶
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$12.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Feb 19, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 11, 2024
- File size
- 22.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.95.0
- Languages
- -
Sezzy Timer trajectory
Basic-Fit trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Sezzy Timer or Basic-Fit? v
Basic-Fit earns about $468.8K per month, while Sezzy Timer earns about $265. That is a 1768.9× revenue gap (~$468.5K more per month for Basic-Fit). Annual revenue: Sezzy Timer ≈ $3.2K/year, Basic-Fit ≈ $5.63M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Sezzy Timer or Basic-Fit? v
Basic-Fit leads with about 6.0M estimated downloads vs 5K for Sezzy Timer - a 1198.1× gap. Sezzy Timer's App Store downloads are estimated from 100 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Basic-Fit reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Sezzy Timer and Basic-Fit in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Sezzy Timer and Basic-Fit have in-app purchases? v
Sezzy Timer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Basic-Fit does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Sezzy Timer runs "Paid app ($1.99)", Basic-Fit runs "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)".
Which has better ratings, Sezzy Timer or Basic-Fit? v
Basic-Fit edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 3.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Sezzy Timer 100 ratings, Basic-Fit 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Sezzy Timer vs Basic-Fit revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $265 for Sezzy Timer and $468.8K for Basic-Fit are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Sezzy Timer or Basic-Fit to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.