Sezzy Timer vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Sezzy Timer
Sarah's Day Pty Limited
App Store
$265/mo
~$3.2K/yr · 5K installs
VS
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
Google Play
$130.3K/mo
~$1.56M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+49078% vs other
Installs winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+27508% vs other
MAU winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+25061% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+20% vs other
Why Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns roughly 492× more per month than Sezzy Timer - $130.3K vs $265.
- Subscription model. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; Sezzy Timer relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter has ~1.4M lifetime installs vs Sezzy Timer's ~5K - 276.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter sits at 4.67★ vs 3.88★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Sezzy Timer
vs
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$265
▶
$130.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.2K
▶
$1.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5K
▶
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
790
▶
199K
App Store rating
3.88★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
100
▶
122K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Feb 19, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 11, 2024
- File size
- 22.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 27, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.30
- Languages
- -
Sezzy Timer trajectory
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Sezzy Timer or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $130.3K per month, while Sezzy Timer earns about $265. That is a 491.8× revenue gap (~$130.1K more per month for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Sezzy Timer ≈ $3.2K/year, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $1.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Sezzy Timer or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter leads with about 1.4M estimated downloads vs 5K for Sezzy Timer - a 276.1× gap. Sezzy Timer's App Store downloads are estimated from 100 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Sezzy Timer and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Sezzy Timer and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter offer? v
Sezzy Timer: no IAP detected on the public listing. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range $9.99 - $39.99 per item. Sezzy Timer runs a "Paid app ($1.99)" monetization model; Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Sezzy Timer or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.9 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Sezzy Timer 100 ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 676 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Sezzy Timer vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $265 for Sezzy Timer and $130.3K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Sezzy Timer or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.