Sidekick by Sorted Food vs Dolce Gusto Touch Timer
Sidekick by Sorted Food
Sorted Food
App Store
$280/mo
~$3.4K/yr · 15K installs
VS
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer
dtylam
Google Play
$324/mo
~$3.9K/yr · 14K installs
Revenue winner
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer wins
+16% vs other
Installs winner
Sidekick by Sorted Food wins
+5% vs other
MAU winner
Sidekick by Sorted Food wins
+8% vs other
Rating winner
Sidekick by Sorted Food wins
+449% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$280
▶
$324
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.4K
▶
$3.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
15K
◀
14K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.49★
◀
-
Total ratings
298
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 23, 2019
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 99.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.4.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD1.9
- Released
- Feb 17, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.5.4
- Languages
- -
Sidekick by Sorted Food trajectory
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Dolce Gusto Touch Timer? v
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer earns about $324 per month, while Sidekick by Sorted Food earns about $280. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$44 more per month for Dolce Gusto Touch Timer). Annual revenue: Sidekick by Sorted Food ≈ $3.4K/year, Dolce Gusto Touch Timer ≈ $3.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Dolce Gusto Touch Timer? v
Sidekick by Sorted Food leads with about 15K estimated downloads vs 14K for Dolce Gusto Touch Timer - a 1.0× gap. Sidekick by Sorted Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 298 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Dolce Gusto Touch Timer reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Sidekick by Sorted Food and Dolce Gusto Touch Timer in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Sidekick by Sorted Food and Dolce Gusto Touch Timer offer? v
Sidekick by Sorted Food: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Dolce Gusto Touch Timer: no IAP detected on the public listing. Sidekick by Sorted Food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; Dolce Gusto Touch Timer runs "Paid app ($1.90)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Dolce Gusto Touch Timer? v
Sidekick by Sorted Food edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: Sidekick by Sorted Food 298 ratings, Dolce Gusto Touch Timer 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Sidekick by Sorted Food vs Dolce Gusto Touch Timer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $280 for Sidekick by Sorted Food and $324 for Dolce Gusto Touch Timer are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Sidekick by Sorted Food or Dolce Gusto Touch Timer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
